The full content of this document is only available to subscribing institutions. More information can be found via www.amdigital.co.uk

Collection Reference Number GLC01790.01
From Archive Folder Catharine Graham Macaulay papers 
Title John Dickinson to Catharine Macaulay discussing the British and American liberty
Date 31 October 1770
Author Dickinson, John (1732-1808)  
Recipient Graham, Catharine Macaulay  
Document Type Correspondence
Content Description Argues that the Freeholders of America are firm in the cause of liberty. Associates the colonial cause with virtue and piety and implicitly identifies Britain with luxury and corruption. It is notable that so many colonists addressed their appeals to an Englishwoman.
Subjects Loyalist  Morality and Ethics  Freedom and Independence  Women's History  Literature and Language Arts  Global History and Civics  Revolutionary War  Civil Rights  Woman Author  
People Dickinson, John (1732-1808)  Graham, Catherine Macaulay (1731-1791)  
Place written Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Theme Women in American History; Arts & Literature; Foreign Affairs
Sub-collection The Gilder Lehrman Collection, 1493-1859
Additional Information The escalating conflict with Britain after 1763 forced the colonists to define their identity as well as the nature of sovereignty and authority through practical action and philosophic reflection. Republican ideology served as a way to articulate a sense of identity. Increasingly, the colonists envisioned themselves as a people emancipated from religious and political despotism, as a simple cooperative people whose virtue and independence rested on land ownership. Signer of the U.S. Constitution. A Philadelphia landlord and lawyer, John Dickinson (1732-1808) played a critical role in mobilizing popular opposition to the Townshend Acts. In a series of newspaper essays, he argued against all parliamentary taxes--both "direct" taxes and "indirect" taxes. Far from being duties to regulate trade, the Townshend Acts were taxes to raise revenue. Taxes disguised as trade duties, he wrote, were "a most dangerous innovation," with the potential for turning the colonists into "abject slaves." Significantly, like Brutus, Dickinson can assume that all white colonists, regardless of class or occupation, are "free," and are thus vulnerable to British "enslavement."
Copyright The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History
Module Settlement, Commerce, Revolution and Reform: 1493-1859
Transcript Show/hide