[draft] My dear Sir Philadelphia 4 Dec. 1782 This Morning I Recd. your Favor of the 2d. of November: It gave me the more sensible Pleasure, because I began to repent that I had wrote you with Respect to the system for the Adjutant Genl. Department. - And more especially, as you have mentioned with Freedom, a Matter which has given [inserted: me] no small Degree of Anxiety. - I must acknowledge it as a particular Mark of Friendship in you, so candidly to give me one of the Reasons, why the Application of the Officers of the Masstts. Line to the Legislature thereof fail'd: you mention my Letter to Mr. Lowell, as having conduced to prevent a Plan which would have given much Dignity to the state, & Contentment to the Army upon this Observation I am extremely sorry that I ever wrote that Letter; which was never intended for the public Eye; - It was wrote to a Friend in whom I had never discovered any Thing but the most cordial Affection for the Army, & consequently was not wrote with that Accuracy & Attention which I should have otherwise aimed at - If I us'd the Word "excessive" I think the Tenor of my Letter will fully show in what sense I us'd it. If I do not misremember, it stands in [inserted: this] Views - If, for Instance, the state of Masstts. should promise to pay a hundred Pounds when they were only able to pay fifty, it would excused their Ability & on their Part be an excessive Promise. I did not give my Opinion that half Pay was more than [2] the united States will be able to discharge; but aimed particularly to show, the Inequality of Rewarding an Officer for one, or two years Service, with as great pecuniary Emoluments, as one, who may have served Eight or ten years - This appeared to me then & still appears to me excessive - It does not seem to me to be founded in Reason - from all the Information I have been able to collect of the sentiments of the Officers of the Masstts. Line, I do not find that mine differs from theirs in substance & Mode they may differ as to Time; which probably arises from my situation, where I have an Opportunity of discovering the sentiments of the states from their Delegates more fully than the Army can possibly do. - I have endeavored to convince the Members of Congress that it would be best to recommend to the States individually, to satisfy their Officers on Acc.t of half Pay - my ill success on this Head, induced me to write Mr. Lowell - for altho' no particular Questions in Congress has been taken on the Matter of referring it to the several states, yet when the Memorial of the [discharged] Officers of the Connecticut Line was before Congress last summer, the subject was largely debated; & it was declared from various Quarters of the House, that if any state undertook to satisfy their Officers half pay, they would do it in their own wrong, & that it could [inserted: not] discharge such state from Requisitions of Congress for half Pay - In this View could [inserted: you] have advised Masstts. to have compromised with her Officers, & have thereby probably laid the Foundation of a very serious dispute with the federal Union. - I sincerely wish to render the Officers of the Masstts. Line every Service in my Power; & nothing will give me greater Pleasure, than to let them know all my [3] Views respecting them, & the Reasons on which I found them; & if, in their Opinion, they should not be Right, to hear their Objections - Heaven forbid that I should be obstinate on illiberal, in any system respecting them. - I am fully of Opinion that an Officer who has been in the Service for seven or Eight years, must have almost entirely disqualified himself for private Business - I have little Idea of Roman Virtue contented with a few Acres. - But my dear Friend, what can a Person have suffered in one or two years by mere Absence from private Business? do you think the Damage to him in the exact Proportion of two to Eight supposing those to be the different Periods of Service? - Indeed I esteem Eight to be much more than four Times two, in this View of the Matter. - It has appeared to me that from the great Number of Officers which have been commissioned many of whom cannot have performed much service in the Field, that it would be necessary to make some Distinction - And I can assure [inserted: you] I feel a hearty Disposition to reward those very liberally who have, hitherto gone thro all the Distress Fatigue Want, & Danger of their Duty in the Field. - I am, Dear Sir, with Sentiments of the highest Esteem your most obedient Servant The Honble. Samuel Osgood. Major general Knox. - [address leaf] The Honorable Major General Knox New York Samuel Osgood. West Point [docket] from Mr S. Osgood 4 Dec 1782